To: RobbyS
Social conservatives will not be who elects the next president.
It will be the middle of the roaders....
You lose them you lose.
42 posted on
08/10/2010 3:08:57 PM PDT by
photoguy
To: photoguy
Social Conservatives provide the same sort of energy for Republican candidates that the public employee unions do for the Democrats. Recall that Bush almost lost in 2000 when on the eve of the election they Democrats sprung their little drunk driving trap. Lots of people who saw Bush as a “church” types stayed home because they felt betrayed.
In any case, it is because Republicans have thought the way you do since Reagan’s time, that it was enough to give lip -service to the pro-life cause is the problem.
54 posted on
08/10/2010 3:18:23 PM PDT by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
To: photoguy
Social conservatives will not be who elects the next president. It will be the middle of the roaders.... and we all know that "middle of the roaders" want sex in kindergarten and free abortions to middle schoolers
63 posted on
08/10/2010 3:27:10 PM PDT by
GeronL
(http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
To: photoguy
92 posted on
08/10/2010 4:29:27 PM PDT by
nonliberal
(Graduate: Curtis E. LeMay School of International Relations)
To: photoguy; nonliberal; Mariner
Social conservatives will not be who elects the next president.
It will be the middle of the roaders.... You lose them you lose.
You guys know nothing about American voters and politics.
Social conservatives are the conservative voters, you lose them and the Republican party ceases to exist.
See post 93.
96 posted on
08/10/2010 4:41:05 PM PDT by
ansel12
(Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson