>>There is no reason for homosexuals to marry one another.
Actually, there is. As in most things, follow the money. The issue here is spousal insurance benefits from employers.
On that note, should this ruling stand, how long will it be before we find two same-sex *heterosexuals* getting married purely so one can take advantage of the other’s employer’s insurance?
Not true. The practice of having the spouse and children on the policy was because the spouse stayed home and raised the children. 2 homosexuals will not produce children and one doesn't need to stay home. Thus there's no reason they can't get it either at work or buy it.