[Liberty1970]

It turns out that the judge himself is a homosexual. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, another judge, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitive nature of the trial, said, "He [Walker] has a private life and he doesn't conceal it, but doesn't think it is relevant to his decisions in any case, and he doesn't bring it to bear in any decisions."

Imagine this was a case about burglary, and we just change one word:

It turns out that the judge himself is a burglar. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, another judge, who asked not to be identified because of the sensitive nature of the trial, said, "He [Walker] has a private life and he doesn't conceal it, but doesn't think it is relevant to his decisions in any case, and he doesn't bring it to bear in any decisions."

Wouldn't we recognize this as absurd? Sinners will always try to justify and rationalize their sin, so long as they refuse to repent.

[NYer]

Excellent example. Do you foresee his ruling being overturned by the Supreme Court?