Posted on 08/10/2010 5:18:05 AM PDT by SJackson
Any "friend of Lebanon" should not take steps to hurt the army.
An adviser to the Lebanese prime minister said Tuesday that the suspension of $100 million in US aid to the Lebanese Armed Forces was unwarranted, and weakens the nation's effort to build the country's army.
Mohamed Chatah, an adviser to Western-backed Prime Minister Saad Hariri, said Tuesday that the Lebanese forces are reliable. He said any "friend of Lebanon" should not take steps that would hurt efforts to build up the army.
The US Congress is blocking funding to the Lebanese military following a cross-border shooting attack on Israeli soldiers last week amidst concern it is cooperating with Hizbullah.
“This incident was tragic and entirely avoidable,” Rep. Nita Lowey (D-New York) said Monday. “US assistance is intended to enhance our safety and that of our allies.”
Lowey chairs the House appropriations subcommittee that authorizes such funds.
The $100 million in Lebanese military assistance approved for 2010 has yet to be disbursed, giving her a window to put the funding on hold for the immediate future.
Lowey is looking to find out more about the nature of what she termed an “outrageous incident,” as well as watching how Lebanon responds in the wake of the violence.
“These holds are typically dependent on the actions and rhetoric coming out of the relevant nations,” a Democratic aide noted.
Similarly, House Foreign Affairs Chairman Howard Berman (D-California) also applied a hold, citing more general concerns about “reported Hizbullah influence on the Lebanese Armed Forces.”
Congressman calls for information on Hizbullah's role in LAF
Berman entered his hold the day before the deadly incident, he said Monday, which only confirmed his reservations.
His office also wants more information on Hizbullah’s role in the LAF, how diligently US weapons are kept track of and how well the LAF cooperates with UNIFIL.
“Until we know more about this incident and the nature of Hizbullah influence on the LAF – and can assure that the LAF is a responsible actor – I cannot in good conscience allow the United States to continue sending weapons to Lebanon,” Berman said.
Last Tuesday, Lebanese Armed Forces soldiers shot at Israeli officers while brush was being cleared along the northern border; one officer was killed and another seriously wounded. The IDF returned fire, killing at least two Lebanese soldiers and a journalist.
A State Department official said the US was still trying to ascertain the facts of the incident, including whether there was any truth behind reports that the LAF troops were using American-supplied weapons.
“We consistently review all of our security assistance programs to all receiving countries,” the official said. “Ultimately, we continue to believe that our support to the LAF and ISF [Internal Security Forces] will contribute toward improving regional security.”
He added that the funding was “part of an international effort to help strengthen the institutions of the Lebanese state. We have provided support to Lebanon to strengthen the ability of the Lebanese government to exercise its own sovereignty.”
Additional $100 m. was requested before incident occured
LAF funding approved for 2009 and already in the pipeline is being distributed by the US as scheduled. Another $100 million had already been requested by the Obama administration for 2011 and considered by Lowey’s subcommittee before the incident occurred.
That money could also be affected when Congress reconvenes from its summer recess in September.
On Monday, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Virginia), the House minority whip, called for 2011’s funding to be blocked until the incident was investigated and it was clear that the Lebanese military wasn’t collaborating with Hizbullah.
“The LAF’s unprovoked attack on the Israeli defense forces in undisputed Israeli territory demands a sweeping reassessment of how we distribute our foreign aid,” Cantor declared in a statement.
“The purpose of the assistance was to build up a Lebanese fighting force that would serve as a check on the growing power of the radical Islamist Hizbullah movement,” he noted, referring to hundreds of millions of dollars the US has already spent training and equipping the LAF in recent years.
“For the past few years, the US and the international community looked the other way as the lines between Hizbullah and the Lebanese military and government became blurred,” he charged. “But the days of ignoring the LAF’s provocations against Israel and protection of Hizbullah in southern Lebanon are over.”
Separately, the US is also looking to boost the military capabilities of Saudi Arabia, with a reported $30 billion arms deal in the works.
The Saudis will be getting the advanced F-15 fighter, although the jet will not have longrange weapons or other systems that Israel has been wary about, according to a report in the Wall Street Journal. Defense Minister Ehud Barak was recently in Washington for talks with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and other top Pentagon officials, in which this issue was understood to have figured prominently.
The US has also taken steps to boost Israeli capabilities as part of maintaining its qualitative military edge (QME), a stated American priority.
Part of the process includes keeping Israel apprised of arms sales to its enemies and giving Jerusalem opportunities to register objections, even if the sales go ahead.
“We have a good dialogue with the United States, and we’re discussing how to maintain Israel’s QME,” said an Israeli official. “In that framework these and other issues can be brought up.”
Lovely. Just lovely.
The U.S. is insolvent, borrowing heavily to stay alive, and still has the money to build the militaries of other countries.
And I'm sure some "conservatives" will come on here and attack me for raising my concerns.
If you’d like to be on or off, please FR mail me.
..................
Not this one.
Here we are with Gates shutting down some operations in Norfolk , cutting our own defense’s and we are sending 100 Million dollars to Lebanon?
Insanity.
“$100 million in US aid to the Lebanese Armed Forces”
I have asked this of every elected representative I have had and never get an answer. I even post to Heritage Foundation in a Q&A and got no reply.
Where in our founding documents and laws does it say; “The king shall tax its citizens and send their treasure to foreign kings?”
Everyone needs to send to their representative.
“The U.S. is insolvent, borrowing heavily to stay alive, and still has the money to build the militaries of other countries.
And I’m sure some “conservatives” will come on here and attack me for raising my concerns.”
Why would you think there would be many Freepers who would attack you over this. Just the opposite, most will agree with you. Why would we be arming our potential Muzzie enemies who live right next door to our ally Israel. Obama, that’s why. To him our friends are his enemies, and our enemies his friends. He’s a total commie/fascist sicko.
Besides, they need that money to continue planning to destroy us and Israel. Did zero not get that memo???
Silly question!
Congress -- even before the Constitution was ratified -- taxed the people and sent money to foreign Kings. For years during the 1780s and 1790s, for example, Congress paid millions in tribute to the Barbary pirates.
Obviously the Framers of the Constitution didn't like to have to do it (the US eventually went to war against the pirates), but they didn't see themselves as being limited in any respect by the Constitution.
I’d say ransom not tribute and Washington and Adams hated it which is why they stopped it.
Wait.....Obama will send 100 million to Iran for “humanitarian aid” or some such BS.
They hated it but they made the payments. The Constitution places few limits on Federal powers w/regard to foreign policy.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.