Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prop. 8 Judge: Pope Hurt Homosexuals
LifeSiteNews.com -- Your Life, Family, and Culture Outpost ^ | August 9, 2010 | By James Tillman

Posted on 08/09/2010 8:06:35 PM PDT by topher

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last
Judicial Activism...
1 posted on 08/09/2010 8:06:39 PM PDT by topher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Salvation; Mrs. Don-o; NYer; markomalley

Ping - your Christian/Catholic beliefs are against the law... So says this activist Judge...


2 posted on 08/09/2010 8:08:23 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah

ping


3 posted on 08/09/2010 8:08:26 PM PDT by aposiopetic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

This Judge is more than just wrong. He’s hideously wrong. It goes beyond activism. His ruling reads like a valley girl rant. So criticism by PERSON A of GROUP A “could be harmful”. You can go anywhere with that kind of logic.


4 posted on 08/09/2010 8:11:03 PM PDT by fkabuckeyesrule (NYC to Jihadist: WE SURRENDER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher
From the Gospel of Matthew:

Matt 19:4-5 (NIV) 4 "Haven't you read," [Jesus] replied, "that at the beginning the Creator 'made them male and female,'
5 and said, 'For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be united to his wife, and the two will become one flesh'?
(NIV)

I guess the Judge does not understand why God [the Creator] created them as man/woman... Maybe someone should have a talk with him...

5 posted on 08/09/2010 8:12:08 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: topher

This judge has no place on a bench.


6 posted on 08/09/2010 8:14:20 PM PDT by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fkabuckeyesrule
Judge Vaughn Walker is so far off the Constitutional Path I wouldn't be surprised at all to see him just off himself out of despair of changing things in time for his own personal benefit!

The guy is Rubber Room material.

7 posted on 08/09/2010 8:15:11 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: topher

“Walker also quotes resolutions from the Southern Baptist Convention, the Evangelical Presbyterian Church, the Free Methodist Church, the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, and the Orthodox Church of America.”

In addition to those church bodies and of course the Catholic church, how about the Orthodox Jews, Muslims, Amish, and who knows how many more religions?

All of them draw lines for sinful behavior. Why did this judge concentrate on mainline Christians?


9 posted on 08/09/2010 8:16:52 PM PDT by freemama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

You aint seen nothing yet.

Wait until Sotomayer and Kegan get themselves in high gear.


10 posted on 08/09/2010 8:17:40 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Ironically, it was Ronald Reagan who nominated him.

He initially riled the gay community with a case against the Gay Olympics saying the Gay community was infringing on the use of the Olympic label for a Gay event... But that was a long time ago...

11 posted on 08/09/2010 8:29:13 PM PDT by topher (Let us return to old-fashioned morality - morality that has stood the test of time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: topher

138 pages is reason alone to disrobe the fellow. And we wonder why the justice system doesn’t work...


12 posted on 08/09/2010 8:37:46 PM PDT by LastNorwegian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

According to news reports, the “judge” is a queer. Therefore by definition he is mentally ill.

One of the sure symtoms of mental illness is ranting against Christians!


13 posted on 08/09/2010 8:43:28 PM PDT by texican01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Venturer
What do you expect from a fag?

When I smoke a fag, I expect superior, smooth taste. That's why I call for Phillip Morris...!

14 posted on 08/09/2010 8:44:35 PM PDT by freebilly (No wonder the left has a boner for Obama. There's CIALIS in soCIALISt....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: topher

What if a judge ruled on a marijuana legalization case, while it was known that he had a sophisticated hydroponic pot farm in his garage? How is this judge’s conflict of interest any less?


15 posted on 08/09/2010 8:44:57 PM PDT by Fantasywriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: topher

Sure, go ahead and attack Christians. Have at it, judges. But remember - everything you rule goes a thousandfold against Muslims, because they actually kill.

And eventually, your rulings are going to have to apply to them, too - O brave liberal judges.

LOL


16 posted on 08/09/2010 8:50:10 PM PDT by Talisker (When you find a turtle on top of a fence post, you can be damn sure it didn't get there on it's own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freemama
Homo marriage will never be accepted. They can legalize it all they want. The hearts and minds of the citizenry will laugh at a homo man and wife. It is unnatural and that fact can never be changed.

Let them pretend all they want. We will never accept their phony marriages. It is like going to the store to buy goods with “Monopoly” money. It is laughable and impossible to be taken seriously.

17 posted on 08/09/2010 8:52:32 PM PDT by libertymaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: topher

Awww, that’s why Congress gets to establish a Church of Tolerance. Oh, wait....


18 posted on 08/09/2010 9:02:42 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly

Caller to drugstore: “Do you have Phillip Morris in the can?”

Answer from clerk: “Yes”

Caller to drugstore: “Well, let him out!”


19 posted on 08/09/2010 9:04:32 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: freemama

Quite often judges don’t just pull these things out of the clear blue sky. They quote from the filings that have been furnished to them in the course of the litigation. This sounds like garbage that was fed to the case by the rabidly pro-gay participants (directly or as amici).


20 posted on 08/09/2010 9:07:48 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson