I am only speculating, but treasonous activity that undermines the national security of the United States is a far cry from turning a blind eye to affairs, drunkenness, drug use, and boorish behavior in general.
They could even reason that the disclosure of the above could harm national security, but when that security itself is threatened, it’s a whole new ballgame.
We’re in new territory now. I’m sure, without intending to malign the noble character of the Secret Service, that they’ve heard unlawful orders given or have seen a decision-making process that would make Constitutionalists angry.
But, ultimately, those decisions were made by a pro-American president who had a pro-American goal in mind. We’re dealing with a different kind of animal in President (maO)bama and Michelleda Marcos.
You're exactly right. We are dealing with people whose agenda is against the best interests of America, and they have the power to enact much of that agenda.