Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cva66snipe

Nope? Wrong answer, although I will agree we should have finished off Hussein the first time around. So, I suppose we’d still be there one way or another.


86 posted on 08/06/2010 4:15:22 PM PDT by freedom_is_earned
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies ]


To: freedom_is_earned
My answer was right. When we abandoned that policy going to limited R.O.E.'s we started losing. Iraq's risk to us is far from over. We made one huge mistake arming an Islamic nation. When will we ever learn not to arm potential enemies and ANY Islamic nation is just that. So some GOP friendly contractors likely made money on the deals to arm Iraq. That does not make the policy right.

Like I've said it would have been wiser to simply gotten Iran and Iraq back at extended war with each other to satisfy that cults thirst for blood. Next Radical Cleric or rather Islamic Charasmatic thug dictator puppet the clerics install to power taking power in Iraq is going to have a bunch of nice shinny weapons and technology to use. All of it thanks to Junior. The only way to eliminate the risk was eliminate ALL Capabilities to harm.

BTW our first military target should have been the hotbead sewer of terrorism called Yemen.

87 posted on 08/06/2010 5:52:15 PM PDT by cva66snipe (Two Choices left for U.S. One Nation Under GOD or One Nation Under Judgment? Which one say ye?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson