Posted on 08/04/2010 1:45:48 PM PDT by tsmith130
Court enjoins enforcement of Prop 8... Will be released at 2 pm pt...
Judge strikes down 'Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California'..
The RIGHT to marry is where in the Constitution.
Is this true for NAMBLA, animals, multiple marriages?
On King o f the Hll Hank says his dream is to get an RV and visit the 48 states except California, I agree with him.
The only drawback to this is how do you link the far left coast with New England?
LOL are they smoking cigs after those oranisms yet?
Why wouldn’t this judge recuse themselves?????
LOL, a homo judge makes his ruling... surprise surprise!
KAGAN MUST BE STOPPED NOW!!!
It is public knowledge that he is gay. It is in his bio write up of wikipedia.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaughn_R._Walker
I live in an urban area and so help me I hope I don’t come across any of these queers celebrating this travesty. I will not hesitate to give them a piece of my mind.
Duh tell that to Lyndsey Graham and the other republitards voting for her.
She will go through or everyone is a racist don’t you know?
None I know of however the problem stems from the State and Federal Governments giving perks (tax deductions, death benefits from Social security etc.) to those who engage in marriage. Because of such then the equal protection clause comes into play.
This should be a lesson to all of us about the law of unintended consequences.
Considering the Founders believed homosexuality was a serious crime, we can conclude they never intended homosexual marriage to be a right.
There needs to be a day when judges like this were forced out of their robes and into picking up guns and fighting a civil war. This sort of tyranny has to stop some time.
For the same reason a straight judge wouldn’t recuse him or herself. This should have gone before a jury, but then again, it already did (Prop 8 VOTE) and also, who can find any hetero’s in San Fran?
Maybe you should read the opinion then. You know where assumptions get you.
I know the history of the case. And I made absolutely no statements about that history. My statements were regarding the judge’s opinion not my own.
How? Prop 8 does not deny anyone the right to marry, period. Saying that it does is deceitful.
When the Federal Marriage definition amendment was being debated a bunch of RINOS voted no, I believe including McCain, because they claimed the DOMA was on the books and individual states had their own state amendments. Well any idiot would of known the gays would of judge shopped and found someone to overturn these laws. A real Republican would order an immediate vote on the amendment now and put the D’s and RINOS on record as in favor of gay marriage. This is going to the Supreme Court and it will be 5-4 for the fags with Kennedy the swing vote. Kennedy has been lock stock and barrel in support of the gay agenda.
True but the Founders would have never allowed Marriage status to confer a financial benefit to the citizens either.
>>They could offer free air travel to California and I’d stay home.<<
That is what I was hinting at in a previous post. I HAVE free air travel and I avoid California. I’m done with that state.
FWIW, I read at patterico.com that the motion to stay was filed yesterday. I guess the defendants had a good idea which way the decision was going to go.
Agreed. That was my point. Sickening.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.