Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: moehoward
"I have not heard from any pro Illegal, no matter how looney, that violent criminals be included in "comprehensive (amnesty) reform".

See my post #33 for an actual list of senators who voted against excluding this element last time it was put to an up and down vote. Only Kyl's vote was a parliamentary maneuver to allow him to bring it back for later consideration.

The remainder either think it is a good idea to include gang bangers and criminals in on amnesty or are simply too afraid to stand up against the race hustlers at La Raza, MALDEF and Mecha on what should be a no brainer.

If there is any explanation other than these two, I have yet to hear it.

53 posted on 08/05/2010 11:04:05 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: Vigilanteman
Close, but not quite. That just allowed those in question to pursue "legal status". It did not deem them eligible for that status.

It's possible the impression was the amendment was too far reaching, it did include some considerably lessor crimes.

54 posted on 08/05/2010 11:47:08 AM PDT by moehoward
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson