To: WilliamIII
Why is this not nationwide now?
2 posted on
08/02/2010 4:00:32 PM PDT by
Frantzie
(Television controls the American people/sheep)
To: WilliamIII
Count one for the good guys.
3 posted on
08/02/2010 4:00:46 PM PDT by
calcowgirl
("California just got the best politicians money can buy." -- AuntB, June 9, 2010)
To: WilliamIII
Affirmative action may have arguably been useful a long while back but with that being said, it is utterly useless now, having long outlived its purpose.
5 posted on
08/02/2010 4:05:27 PM PDT by
cranked
To: WilliamIII
There just has to be an exception in there for Middle Aged White Guys M.A.W.G’s. It ‘s probably hidden somewhere in the ruling. It will come out, just wait and see.
6 posted on
08/02/2010 4:06:04 PM PDT by
Cyman
To: WilliamIII
Sanity from San Francisco? This is a red letter day!
I'll take good news anyway I can get it.
10 posted on
08/02/2010 4:26:57 PM PDT by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough.)
To: WilliamIII
unless you are from out of the country...
11 posted on
08/02/2010 4:29:37 PM PDT by
Chode
(American Hedonist *DTOM* -ww- NO Pity for the LAZY)
To: WilliamIII
Doesn't matter.
This law is not practiced in this state and never will be enforced.
they'll just call it something else...like "diverse background" etc.
However, one day there'll be a very very big suit that will prevail. Somebody will get rich...the taxpayers will pay...and govt agencies will continue to ignore the law...and somebody else will get rich etc.
12 posted on
08/02/2010 4:31:29 PM PDT by
Mariner
(USS Tarawa, VQ3, USS Benjamin Stoddert, NAVCAMS WestPac, 7th Fleet, Navcommsta Puget Sound)
To: WilliamIII
“Affirmative action” is a misnomer, it’s unconstitutional, inherently racist and sexist, and nothing more than a political payoff for those who don’t want to work for a living.
If you can’t compete, you don’t belong.
To: WilliamIII
JOhn Roberts pretty much nailed it when he said that the way to end racial discrimination was to stop discriminating by race.
To: WilliamIII
“In a 6-1 ruling, the state Supreme Court rejected arguments from the city of San Francisco and Attorney General Jerry Brown “
Fyi that idiot is running for governor again.
To: WilliamIII
And now on to the 9th Circus.
19 posted on
08/02/2010 6:14:13 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(''I don't regret setting bombs,I feel we didn't do enough.'' ->Bill Ayers,Hussein's mentor,9/11/01)
To: WilliamIII
Opponents of the ban say it creates barriers for minorities and women that don't exist for other groups, such as veterans seeking preference. So what exactly are the barriers? Having to compete on the same terms as everyone else?
21 posted on
08/02/2010 6:17:12 PM PDT by
freespirited
(There are a lot of bad Republicans but there are no good Democrats.--Ann Coulter)
To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; blueyon; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; ...
...upheld the state's 14-year-old law barring preferential treatment of women and minorities in public school admissions, government hiring and contracting. In a 6-1 ruling...
Thanks WilliamIII.
22 posted on
08/02/2010 7:43:57 PM PDT by
SunkenCiv
("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
To: WilliamIII
Does this mean Obama will have to step down?
28 posted on
08/03/2010 7:52:26 AM PDT by
Gabrial
(The Whitehouse Nightmare will continue as long as the Nightmare is in the Whitehouse)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson