Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RowdyFFC

He is not being charged with being AWOL. He is charged with missing movement. Your argument will not be heard by the court. He received a legal order, the evidence will show that without ever mentioning the President, and the evidence will show that he refused to obey it. It won’t take long.


49 posted on 08/02/2010 8:23:08 AM PDT by centurion316
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: centurion316
. Your argument will not be heard by the court. He received a legal order, the evidence will show that without ever mentioning the President, and the evidence will show that he refused to obey it. It won’t take long.

Evidence is presented by both sides in a Court Martial trial. The UCMJ specifically states that the accused must be allowed to present his defense. The hitch is that the Military Judge, and not the Court, gets to decide if evidence is "relevant", before allowing it to be presented.

128 posted on 08/02/2010 7:11:52 PM PDT by El Gato ("The second amendment is the reset button of the US constitution"-Doug McKay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

To: centurion316

Well, that’s rather the POINT. He doesn’t think he received a LEGAL ORDER. AND his standing orders tell him not to obey an order that he deems illegal until he finds out whether it’s legal OR NOT! The burden of proof of submitting a legal order is on the COC at this point!


262 posted on 08/03/2010 2:53:01 PM PDT by RowdyFFC (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson