Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop

So, under this bill GHW Bush’s landslide of ‘88 would have included Massachusetts electoral votes?
I can’t figure out why Massachusetts Democrats would support this? There doesn’t seem to be any upside for them.


37 posted on 07/31/2010 3:49:07 PM PDT by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Lancey Howard
Massachusetts almost always votes for the Democrat candidate--even McGovern won Massachusetts (although Mondale did not, and Reagan won very narrowly in 1980 thanks to John Anderson taking votes away from Carter). If they wanted to, I suppose the legislature could pass a law that the state's electors would be chosen by a majority vote of the members of the state legislature.

Right now voter fraud only helps the Democrats win individual states. If there was a national popular vote, there would be an incentive for even more widespread vote fraud in all the big cities.

41 posted on 07/31/2010 3:59:11 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson