Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind

In her full transcript she actually proves Breitbart’s case, when she accuses Repubs of being racists for opposing health care.

So, while allegedly proving that she no longer sees the world through racial lenses, she actually proves the reverse. She is not capable of seeing the world any other way.


37 posted on 07/29/2010 12:51:59 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marron
In her full transcript she actually proves Breitbart’s case

In the initial excerpt aired by Breitbart, the reaction of the NAACP proves his case, his intent in airing the video in the first place. It had nothing to do with her, but for the fact that what she was saying demonstrated the inherent racism in that crowd. She cannot show Breitbart defaming her, damaging her, nothing to do with her. Her tort, if she had one, is with Vilsack.

49 posted on 07/29/2010 1:03:07 PM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson