Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Blue Turtle

On what grounds?

If a lawsuit is in order, it should be against the guys who fired her.


4 posted on 07/29/2010 9:52:26 AM PDT by Tzimisce (No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Tzimisce

>>If a lawsuit is in order, it should be against the guys who fired her.<<

That pretty much nails the issue here. It’s also comical that they did.


39 posted on 07/29/2010 10:45:19 AM PDT by RobRoy (The US Today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: Tzimisce
"If a lawsuit is in order, it should be against the guys who fired her."

She should also be suing the NAACP since they were the ones who contacted the White House to get her fired. They and Vilsack failed to research the video, and acted on impulse in ordering her firing. Her comments were taped at an NAACP event. What grounds she has to sue Breitbart is beyond me. It wasn't his fault that the NAACP and Vilsack reacted impulsively without investigating the comments.

40 posted on 07/29/2010 10:46:43 AM PDT by mass55th (Courage is being scared to death - but saddling up anyway...John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson