To: SeekAndFind
What they showed...
What we get...
7 posted on
07/27/2010 12:08:45 PM PDT by
Dallas59
(President Robert Gibbs 2009-2013)
To: Dallas59
What??
No Babe??
That sucks!
19 posted on
07/27/2010 12:11:29 PM PDT by
Howie66
(I can see November from my house.)
To: Dallas59
What, don’t you see the similarities?!?!? Its nearly the same..., except for the less expensive Malibu sheet metal, undercarrage, suspension, interior, paint....
Oh, wait...
Nah, come on people, GM wouldn’t change this up on you, would they?
I see the bean counters are still running GM.
To: Dallas59
114 posted on
07/27/2010 1:19:12 PM PDT by
Cobra64
To: Dallas59
What they showed...
What we get...
Actually, the production model looks like this ...
But still a far cry from the concept.
117 posted on
07/27/2010 1:23:53 PM PDT by
al_c
(http://www.blowoutcongress.com)
To: Dallas59
The car at the time was an initial concept. It's not unusual for the concept to be radically different from the final model. What killed the concept is that it did poorly in wind tunnel tests. So they had to change body styling to get the drag coefficients required.
The second picture is that of a mule. It's a Volt Car with a Chevy Cruze Body. So you are really off and deceptive in showing these pictures.
122 posted on
07/27/2010 1:30:17 PM PDT by
truthguy
(Good intentions are not enough.)
To: Dallas59
Put a super charged v-6 in the first verson, have Ford build it and I would buy two!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
