To: no dems
Palin was, more or less, obligated to endorse the guy who put her on the national stage. Had she not, people would have considered her an ingrate because, had it not been for John McCain (whom I loathe), she would still be an unknown Governor from Alaska. Please, not this crap again. That dog don't hunt! Palin went against the principles she had publicly expressed and endorsed a candidate about as far from a "common sense conservative" as you can get. She sold out, and the reason she did it doesn't matter. She will have the consequences of a McCain victory on her head.
Is she the devil? No. Did she sell out conservatives who were counting on her? Yes.
To: Prokopton
That crap, as you call it, happens to be the truth.
But if you need someone to blame because Hayworth couldn’t do the job, feel free.
37 posted on
07/26/2010 8:07:51 AM PDT by
altura
To: Prokopton; McGavin999
Well, first of all, let me say that I hope J.D. wins. I can't stand McCain. But, let me ask you and McGavin999 this....
Did all you Palin-haters give J.D. a pass on pimping for a free grant at taxpayers expense on an infomercial like some carnival hawker? Huh? Huh? Huh?
56 posted on
07/26/2010 8:24:29 AM PDT by
no dems
(Palin/Jindal in 2012 or Jindal/Christie in 2012. Either is fine with me.)
To: Prokopton
“Is she the devil? No. Did she sell out conservatives who were counting on her? Yes.”
It’s hard for me to imagine any conservative not noticing that Palin had previously endorsed McCain for president. Anyone subsequently surprised that she might endorse him for senate as well just wasn’t paying any attention at all.
75 posted on
07/26/2010 9:56:18 AM PDT by
COgamer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson