She had a capable successor who finished her agenda.
How is that "quitting?" Quitting implies that when you quit a job, the position is left open and there is temporary confusion on who would do the remaining duties until a replacement is chosen. Nothing of that sort happened in Alaska.
Aren’t you going to great lengths to argue whether she ‘quit’ or not? She did, plain and simple. As to constitutional duties, SHE was elected by the people, not the “capable successor” she determined would do a good job.
Would you feel a little upset if you were an Obama voter and he quit to leave the job of President to the “capable” hands of Biden?
on second thought, don’t answer that...but you get my point!