Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin and Newt, according to Fred Thompson and Rich Galen
Vanity | 07/24/2010 | Brices Crossroads

Posted on 07/24/2010 3:47:23 PM PDT by Brices Crossroads

Below is a transcript of a portion of Fred Thompson's interview with Rich Galen on his radio show July 23, 2010 in which Thompson and Galen discuss the relative merits of Gingrich and Palin, as well as the likelihood that either or both will enter the GOP.

Galen is a former press Secretary to Gingrich, and he gives the back of his hand to Sarah Palin in the interview, calling her "a really interesting personalit[y]...but not necessarily ... qualified to be the nominee or be president." Incredibly, and to his discredit, Thompson laughingly agrees:

"THOMPSON: Uh huh...

GALEN: And uh, I don’t think Sarah Palin’s ever going to be the nominee. I don’t think she believes that she can be the nominee and I’m not sure she wants to get into that. I mean, I think she’s, uh...you know...she’s doing what she does and she’s doing what she does better than anybody we’ve seen in a long time.

THOMPSON: You know she may be in the first stages of Newtism, and that is, uh, being...being a real player and going around the country making lots of money. (Laughs)

GALEN: Yeah, and ...

THOMPSON: That’s what Newt’s done for a long time and maybe he’s ready...maybe he’s ready for the next stage and maybe, uh, you’re right. Maybe Sarah’s idea is that she’ll do this for a while and then her second stage will come along a little later."

As someone who supported Fred Thompson in 2007-8 both on this forum and financially, I am bitterly disappointed that, at a minimum, he did not correct Galen's outrageous statement that she is unqualified to be either the nominee or the President. I know Rush Limbaugh or Mark Levin would have defended her because I have heard them both do it. In fact, Galen would never even have made such an outrageous statement in front of them because he would know it would draw a harsh refudiation from either El Rushbo or the Great One. (In fact, I heard Levin take Ann Coulter to task one time because she trashed Thompson).

Instead, he says "uh huh" and proceeds to amplify Galen's canard by citing the lamestream media/GOP Establishment wishful thinking-spin that she is too happy making money to run. Galen is a RINO "gun for hire" and former employee of Gingrich. He is not admirable, but he is doing what he is paid for. Fred Thompson has no such excuse. Shame on him.

The transcript of the entire segment on Newt and Palin is below:

"THOMPSON: Rich Galen, the founder of Mullings.com, the wit and wisdom of Rich Galen uh, if you want to check that out. Rich, you’ve been around here a long time, uh, you worked for Newt Gingrich, you worked for Dan Quayle and, uh, GOPAC and uh...

GALEN: And Fred Thompson..

THOMPSON: Yeah, I thank you much for that. We had a lot of fun on the campaign trail. They’re coming out of the woodwork now. Do you think Newt might be serious this time...?

GALEN: Yeah I do...

THOMPSON: You know Newt pretty well and Newt, this time of the year every four years you know, uh, says, “Well, I’m thinking about it, I’m thinking about it” and then he doesn’t. What do you think?

GALEN: Yeah, I think that, uh, that this time, unless there is some..something pops up between now and next February that says “don’t do it”, he’s...I think he’s disposed to do it. So I think he’s gonna be a candidate.

THOMPSON: Is that right? How do you think he figures...is it as clear as, you know, it seems to be, and that is that Obama is very unpopular and, uh, he can’t come back like Reagan did, uh, in his second two years and be re-elected?

GALEN: And Clinton did...

THOMPSON: And Clinton did...

GALEN: Yeah, you can’t..I don’t think you can project that far out. I think what Newt is...and I’m putting words in his mouth; I haven’t discussed this with him...I have discussed the first part with him, but not this part.

THOMPSON: Uh huh...

GALEN: The, uh, I think what Newt is looking at is A) the Republican competition, first of all. I mean, it doesn’t matter whether the incumbent can be defeated. If you’re not the nominee then it doesn’t make any difference. Um, and uh, I think he looks across the landscape, uh and he sees some really interesting personalities.

THOMPSON: (Loudly laughs) You’ve been in town too long Rich, you’re becoming too diplomatic. (Loudly laughs again)

GALEN: But not necessarily people who are qualified to be the nominee or be president.

THOMPSON: Uh huh...

GALEN: And uh, I don’t think Sarah Palin’s ever going to be the nominee. I don’t think she believes that she can be the nominee and I’m not sure she wants to get into that. I mean, I think she’s, uh...you know...she’s doing what she does and she’s doing what she does better than anybody we’ve seen in a long time.

THOMPSON: You know she may be in the first stages of Newtism, and that is, uh, being...being a real player and going around the country making lots of money. (Laughs)

GALEN: Yeah, and ...

THOMPSON: That’s what Newt’s done for a long time and maybe he’s ready...maybe he’s ready for the next stage and maybe, uh, you’re right. Maybe Sarah’s idea is that she’ll do this for a while and then her second stage will come along a little later.

GALEN: There’s no, uh, I mean there’s no advantage for somebody like Sarah Palin to absolutely do, uh, you know, do a, uh, what’s the statement that we always talk about?

THOMPSON: Sherman-like...

GALEN: A Sherman statement, you know, if nominated I will not run. If elected, I will not serve. I mean, it doesn’t do any good to take herself out of the running. It makes good sense for her to be among the mentioned and, uh, you know why get in the way of that? Next Spring, sometime, she’ll decide what she wants to do and everybody will react to it then. But uh,...

THOMPSON: Uh huh...

GALEN: Yeah, I think the threshold question is I think Newt is serious about it.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: gingrich; newt; newtgingrich; palin; romney; romneyantipalin; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 341-356 next last
To: excopconservative

Well.

Some of these anti Palin people make me so angry. Don’t expect me to respect them.


241 posted on 07/24/2010 7:23:48 PM PDT by se_ohio_young_conservative (WLOH 1320 AM 104.5 FM .."The Voice of Fairfield County")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: Gurn; se_ohio_young_conservative
He accused me of being on Journolist just because I'm not ga-ga over Palin.

Gurn, it appears the poster called you a jounolist after you called Palin "as deep as a coffee saucer".

When you post something snide about a candidate a person likes, it's really not all that surprising when a poster return the favor.

242 posted on 07/24/2010 7:25:22 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Forty-Niner
Jindal, by his own admission does not meet the requirements to hold the office, and will not be running, so support/no support for him is moot.

Uh, what? Which requirements? He's old enough, and he was born in Baton Rouge. What have I missed?

243 posted on 07/24/2010 7:27:37 PM PDT by Gurn (Remember Mountain Meadows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

Comment #244 Removed by Moderator

To: Gurn

His parents were not citizens at the time of his birth.
.


245 posted on 07/24/2010 7:29:56 PM PDT by editor-surveyor (Obamacare is America's kristallnacht !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

“But Rich Galen?”

Rich who....?


246 posted on 07/24/2010 7:31:37 PM PDT by GGpaX4DumpedTea (I am a tea party descendant - steeped in the Constitutional legacy handed down by the Founders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

The people I know who have met and worked with Jindal all uniformly agree that the man is brilliant. I’d like nothing more than to see him make a move in the near future to the national stage. Right now, his only negative I can discern is his relative obscurity.


247 posted on 07/24/2010 7:34:15 PM PDT by Melas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

Comment #248 Removed by Moderator

Comment #249 Removed by Moderator

Comment #250 Removed by Moderator

To: editor-surveyor
I think you're mistaken.

No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.

That's from article 2, Section 1. Nothing about parents.

251 posted on 07/24/2010 7:40:37 PM PDT by Gurn (Remember Mountain Meadows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 245 | View Replies]

Comment #252 Removed by Moderator

To: Melas
was your comment ‘Sparky’ necessary grandma?

(ooops was only going to post once...but that dumb name calling got to me again!!)

253 posted on 07/24/2010 7:42:45 PM PDT by haircutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

Comment #254 Removed by Moderator

To: Frantzie

Thompson entered the race half hearted to spilt the conservative vote for his dear friend McCain.


255 posted on 07/24/2010 7:43:34 PM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: All

Knock it off. Continue at your own peril.


256 posted on 07/24/2010 7:46:15 PM PDT by Admin Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Melas

I like Jindal but he has polishing to do too.


257 posted on 07/24/2010 7:47:01 PM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

Comment #258 Removed by Moderator

To: Gurn

You did direct a post at me, perhaps inadvertently.

Either way the Mods desire no more animosity on this thread and I’m inclined to comply.

Good day.


259 posted on 07/24/2010 7:49:07 PM PDT by free me (Sarah Palin 2012? You Betcha!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #260 Removed by Moderator


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 341-356 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson