Did Brietbart tamper with the tapes? Are the tapes not an accurate representation of the truth? Under what rule of law is accurately (or not) representing the spoken word of a public servant a crime, civil or criminal? If this is successful, can Bush sue Dan Rather?
Good point. My guess is that she is a public figure owing to her govt position and her role in the big lawsuit against USDA.
According to Breitbart he aired the tape the way it was give to him.
In the age of Kagan, she might win. It matters not that all Breitbart did was post video of what she said; his implications were a lie.