Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

For Terrorism Trials, Civilian Courts Are Up To The Job [Sen Feinstein Gone Mad?]
LA Times ^ | July 20, 2010

Posted on 07/20/2010 12:39:36 PM PDT by Steelfish

For Terrorism Trials, Civilian Courts Are Up To The Job Our federal courts are unmatched at putting terrorism suspects on trial, collecting intelligence when possible and sending them away for good.

Dianne Feinstein

July 20, 2010

We haven't heard much lately from the folks who say the Obama administration is making America vulnerable by trying terrorists in federal criminal courts instead of in military commissions.

It's probably because their rhetoric has been dealt a serious blow by the flurry of guilty pleas this year by high-profile terror suspects. They include: • Faisal Shahzad, who pleaded guilty in June to attempting to blow up a bomb-laden SUV in Times Square in a plot supported by the Pakistani Taliban. • David Headley, who admitted in March to helping plan the deadly 2008 attacks in Mumbai and to plotting to bomb a Danish newspaper. • And Najibullah Zazi, who admitted in February to a suicide bomb plot aimed at New York's subways and supported by Al Qaeda.

All three pleaded guilty in federal courts, and all three now face maximum terms of life in federal prison — where there is no possibility of parole. All three are also cooperating with authorities.

In another case, this month, federal prosecutors in Brooklyn unsealed an indictment charging five men in an Al Qaeda plot to attack targets in Britain and the United States, including the New York City subway system. It is believed the indictment was crafted, at least in part, with information supplied by Zazi and a co-defendant.

So much for the claim that our federal courts aren't up to the job.

These cases are not anomalies.

(Excerpt) Read more at latimes.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 07/20/2010 12:39:38 PM PDT by Steelfish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Sure! Put me on the jury!


2 posted on 07/20/2010 12:53:02 PM PDT by R. Scott (Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

The irony here is that liberal activists have so damaged our judicial system that the public has to look elsewhere when a serious threat comes along.


3 posted on 07/20/2010 12:53:44 PM PDT by Spok (Free Range Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Steelfish

Who’s going to be responsible for the jurors security AFTER they find the terrorist guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? Everyone will know their names...who will protect them and their families?

The terrorists are known for revenge!


4 posted on 07/20/2010 2:01:26 PM PDT by Shade_Trees_56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

The court should REQUIRE Finestine and Holder to be in attendance each and every day of the trial(s).


5 posted on 07/20/2010 2:02:42 PM PDT by Waco (From Seward to Sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson