These liberals say they wouldn’t mind if the whole world was on a trust fund.
(Is that Heinekin Guy driving the golfcart?)
The world is turned upside down.
When he bought a house in Chicago, he didn't get a place in the 'hood among the homies he pretends to be all about.
He bought a mansion with financial backing from the same Chicago political/crime (one-in-the-same in Chicago) connected crook that financed every one of his political campaigns, Tony Rezko.
The only thing "populist" about Obama, as with all Socialist "leaders", is that he uses the masses to give him power and privilege at their expense.
He deserves it, afterall, since his infinite wisdom allows him to manage their lives far better than they could ever do themselves.
The operative word in the term "Union Worker" is Union.
Work and productivity is secondary.
What is important is the power amassing votes and voices together into a block gives to elitist megalomaniacs like Obama.
Pretending to be one of them, or even to care about them, is just part of the game.
All these charges are true, yet it is still taken as axiomatic that the Democrats are the party of “the working man,” while Republicans are fat-cat country-clubbers. How can a party that “boasts” the likes of Ted Kennedy (and the rest of that decadent ilk) and John Kerrey claim any kinship with blue-collar America? What does a Harvard-educated Establishment tool like Barack Obama have in common with Joe the Plumber? For sheer grit and bootstrap success, Sarah Palin is a much better model.