Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: greyfoxx39

“Maybe”? I don’t see how it helps J.D. Their assessment of the debate is that there was NO clear winner between him and McCain — which, if you read what the Freepers have been saying, is highly inaccurate.

J.D. won the debate, and he will probably win the next debate as well, but I doubt he will win the primary. The tea partiers’ sympathy is torn between him and Deakin, and the bluehairs and idiots (as someone has called them elsewhere in this thread) can be relied on to go in a solid bloc for McLame.


31 posted on 07/17/2010 3:51:13 PM PDT by Jake from AZ (Vote GOP in '10 and '12: Exercise Your Futility)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: Jake from AZ
Hey, when McCain is spending like crazy, all the RINOs endorse him, the AZ media won't air or print a damned good word about JD, IMO "maybe" an article saying "Their assessment of the debate is that there was NO clear winner between him and McCain" just MIGHT get the attention of some.

Now, if we can see more articles in which JD is the clear winner, that will be very good. So far, the OP is about the only one I have seen.

The azRagRepublic is bending over backward in keeping the debate OUT of the top three headlines on its site.

40 posted on 07/17/2010 4:03:57 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (If voters follow the democrat method of 2004 Obama will be named the worst president in history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson