Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Marechal
one would even waste the time and resources to maintain “pets”.

One could insert "elderly", "affirm" and many other things for "pets". People who have animals understand.
6 posted on 07/16/2010 11:41:59 AM PDT by Red in Blue PA (Anti-Gunners suffer from Factose Intolerance)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Red in Blue PA
Exactly. If nothing else, pets will provide a little needed levity in a crisis. Those of us who are attached to our pets understand. Even if they're nothing more than my two parrots (for whom I've laid in a year's supply of seeds and pellets, and am continually adding to), they're part of the family. Any slimebag who wants to make soup out of my little buddies will suffer horribly for it.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

127 posted on 07/16/2010 1:45:51 PM PDT by wku man (Claire Wolfe's clock is winding down...tick......tick..........tick...............tick..............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson