[Principled]

She was absolutely correct in her assertion that Kirsten did not have credible knowledge of the facts.

I don't agree. Although Megyn easily won, it was as much a shout-over as a fact-win.

Megyn did not press Kirsten when she flip-flopped on whether intimidation occured - and Megyn did not do well vs kirsten's talking point of "Bush's people dismissed many more".

Those of us who know the facts know the talking points are just that - but it is disappointing when they're not "hit out of the park" in what is described as a total ask kissing.

But, I did enjoy watching ;)

Now, I'm not doing anything but defending my position that it wasn't a "total ask kissing". Megyn did win and looked good doing it. I'm disagreeing with the characterization of it being such a devastating win, that's all.

[VRW Conspirator]

I don't agree. Although Megyn easily won, it was as much a shout-over as a fact-win.

Bump that. When KP started in on the Bush Admin, I rolled my eyes. Lib talking points. The old standby, the everybody-does-it defense that the Libs love to throw out when they are losing an argument. It is designed to derail the current debate.