And, are not the majority of Americans "injured" by a "president" who refuses to verify if he meets the minimum qualifications to be president in accordance with the Constitution? If we are a nation of laws and not men, why is it that the men who have challenged his eligibility are being dissed by the courts whose job it is to enforce or interpret the law?
Again, this is a fundamental Constitutional issue and, IMO, ANY American citizen should have the right to challenge him on Constitutional grounds.
I agree with you completely. I believe that the communist regime is showing its teeth. It's using the Chicago thuggery to scare anybody who seriously challenges them. That must include judges who must have been told something like... you will be responsible for riots and civil disorder, etc.
The country of law and order is held hostage by the threat of minority rioting and destroying our peace and tranquility.
I tried to go around the ridiculous excuse of "standing." I read somewhere, maybe on FR, that an election result is not considered collectively injurious to the populace. Therefore, I thought I found a way to prove that a candidate is injured and the court should rectify it under equal protection under the law.
I'm afraid that we've to jump hoops to stop the communists from shredding the constitution and do what they please.
Come November, if we take at least the House, we should start defunding all 0b0z0's passed bills, investigating all what this Administration did, including but not limited to, the appointed Communist Czars, etc.