Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dinoparty
For instance, something cannot be both a particle and not a particle ... this violates the law of noncontradiction which is the very basis of our logic ...

Well, the more basic question there is "what do you mean when you say 'particle?'"

Consider that the word "particle" may be only a poor analogy made in an attempt to make something that is far more complex and subtle at least somewhat understandable.

There are no contradictions, it's true. Therefore an photon is neither a "particle" nor a "wave," but rather is, quite simply, a photon which behaves precisely as a photon behaves.

94 posted on 07/14/2010 1:33:11 PM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]


To: mvpel

May be. However it seems to me that even the term “photon” as a descriptor of some third item is itself just a poor attempt to describe something that cannot be described. I think science has at bottom the futile attempt to solve the scientifically unsolveable problem of eternity — in space, size, mass and time. Despite all the collected observations throughout history science has moved not an inch closer to figuring out eternity in any of its dimensions. It has, however, helped society immensely in the material/technological realm.


95 posted on 07/14/2010 1:50:16 PM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson