What’s “wrong” with Dr. Paul is that his consistency with respect to the Constitution shames these “conservatives” to the point they have to attack him or admit their own big government proclivities... you know, admit they’re those “wide-stance,” light-in-the-loafers pervs they deny being. With respect to Dr. Paul’s positions, I may disagree with some of them, but I always have to admire the fact that he first goes to the Constitution to see if a bill or a desired action is permissible, then, if yes, asks himself if it is NEEDFUL. THEN he asks if we can AFFORD it, financially or in terms of young Americans killed or maimed by a potential enemy, et cetera. To the bloodthirsty armchair generals, no one should ever ask that last question.
My points exactly. Why all the hate against Dr. Paul? He has always voted on the Constitution. Everyone talks about 0bama ripping the Constitution to shreds so why bash on a politician who wants to bring the principles in the Constitution BACK to America?