Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

The vagueness is in your reply to me about “historians”... either one.”

I asked you “which historians,” meaning which historians do you mean, like WHO, didn’t buy into “that claim by that author,” and which author? The original author, Hugh A. Garland, who wrote the biography in 1853 and quoted Randolph’s letter? Or David Barton’s citation of Randolph’s conversion using Garland’s book as the basis of his comments?


73 posted on 07/04/2010 8:35:47 PM PDT by TurkeyLurkey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: TurkeyLurkey
I asked you “which historians,” meaning which historians do you mean, like WHO, didn’t buy into “that claim by that author,” and which author? The original author, Hugh A. Garland, who wrote the biography in 1853 and quoted Randolph’s letter? Or David Barton’s citation of Randolph’s conversion using Garland’s book as the basis of his comments?

I think the burden is on you and your goofy claim, and your goofy authors, do you accept that Abraham Lincoln was black?

77 posted on 07/04/2010 8:45:48 PM PDT by ansel12 (Mitt: "I was an independent during the time of Reagan-Bush. I'm not trying to return to Reagan-Bush")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson