But the costs associated with implementing such a system would likely be enormous. The NSTIC has anticipated some kickback and will be offering businesses incentives such as tax credits/breaks, insurance, grants and loans for early adoption.
1 posted on
07/04/2010 8:32:35 AM PDT by
nmh
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: nmh
Not a good idea!
Be Ever Vigilant!
55 posted on
07/04/2010 9:16:00 AM PDT by
blackie
(Be Well~Be Armed~Be Safe~Molon Labe!)
To: nmh; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
What a great idea! And they can tattoo it on your forehead or wrist so you'll never lose it!
Can you imagine how much Halidol the DUmmies would've had start popping if Dubya proposed this? For that matter, has Il Douche considered the fact that sooner or later, this system will be in the hands of a Republican administration? (Or maybe he doesn't plan for there to be any more administration changes...)
56 posted on
07/04/2010 9:17:37 AM PDT by
Slings and Arrows
(You can't have IngSoc without an Emmanuel Goldstein.)
To: nmh
I call GreenAccord! (Touches Internet with hand)
57 posted on
07/04/2010 9:19:52 AM PDT by
GreenAccord
(Bakon Akbar!)
To: nmh
It's all featherbeds and flowers, floating on a land of wonderful.
Yet another attempt by our twisted Bureaucracy to make people wear helmets and knee pads. A fur-lined shock-collar to keep the People in the yard.
Spinach.
60 posted on
07/04/2010 9:37:16 AM PDT by
Prospero
(non est ad astra mollis e terris via)
To: nmh
65 posted on
07/04/2010 9:57:55 AM PDT by
Nick Danger
(Pin the fail on the donkey)
To: nmh
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
67 posted on
07/04/2010 10:26:51 AM PDT by
The Comedian
(Evil can only succeed if good men don't point at it and laugh.)
To: nmh
To: nmh
The Dems have their sights set on controlling their subjects with this sort of oppressive foolishness. The costs of maintaining and securing a national online ID would be astronomical and fraud would be rampant. Seems to be a forerunner of national voting via the internet. I’m sure Dems would love internet voting in the future as it would be infinitely susceptible to manipulation.
To: nmh
To highlight the potential consumer benefits of such a system, the White Houses proposal uses the example of an individual filling a prescription online. Under the smart ID card, the pharmacy would only receive proof that the individual is over 18 and that the prescription is valid. No other information like birth date or the reason for the prescription. This from the president who STILL will not release his birth certificate as a matter of "national security" and "privacy".
83 posted on
07/06/2010 8:15:21 AM PDT by
a fool in paradise
(I wish our president loved the US military as much as he loves Paul McCartney.)
To: nmh
Like everything else, the government will not rest until it totally destroys the Internet by controlling, regulating, and taxing it.
85 posted on
07/06/2010 8:27:08 AM PDT by
dragnet2
To: nmh
The Identity Ecosystem would allow Americans to choose to obtain a single authenticated ID for online transactions.
. . .
Voluntary until it isn’t.
Besides, this isn’t about online transactions. Politicians and government agencies want to know exactly WHO is saying WHAT about THEM.
88 posted on
08/03/2010 12:25:41 AM PDT by
Nickname
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson