Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin

This author needs to look at the official definition of the word “socialism” and not put up some false straw man definition.


3 posted on 06/29/2010 10:38:56 AM PDT by taxcontrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: taxcontrol

He, intentionally or otherwise, missed the distinction between the Federal government spending money on defense (which it should) and government spending money on hand-outs (which it should not.)


6 posted on 06/29/2010 10:43:45 AM PDT by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: taxcontrol

That’s correct. Just because there are private companies does not mean that there is not rampant socialism running right alongside. Actually, of course, the situation is quite tenable for fascism, which requires a private sector to vampirically drain.

Just because nobody’s being herded into concentration camps does not mean we are not suffering under fascism, which is socialism-lite.


9 posted on 06/29/2010 10:45:41 AM PDT by BelegStrongbow (Ey, Paolo! uh-Clem just broke the Presideng...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson