Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Feingold To Vote 'No' On Wall Street Reform
Real Clear Politics ^ | 06/28/2010 | Staff

Posted on 06/28/2010 4:54:39 PM PDT by OldDeckHand

Wisconsin Sen. Russ Feingold voted against the Senate version of the Wall Street reform bill last month and now says he will again oppose the measure when the conference report is put up for a vote.

“As I have indicated for some time now, my test for the financial regulatory reform bill is whether it will prevent another crisis," Feingold said in a released statement. "The conference committee's proposal fails that test and for that reason I will not vote to advance it."

(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.blogs.time.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: finance; regulation; search; senate
He's voting "no" for all the wrong reasons, but it is what it is - and what it is, is that it's going to come down to Chuck Grassley. If Grassley switches from a "yes" to a "no", it's done.
1 posted on 06/28/2010 4:54:44 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Probably feeling pressure from Johnson.


2 posted on 06/28/2010 4:56:55 PM PDT by MarkeyD (Obama is a victim of Affirmative Action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I don’t think much of Feingold - his work to get around the First Amendment permanently with what he called “campaign finance reform” soured me on him, and I suspect his reasons for opposing this horrid bill are also all wrong. Still, I’ll take any votes we can get for limited government.


3 posted on 06/28/2010 4:57:29 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Damn Republicans!


4 posted on 06/28/2010 4:58:35 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Damn Republicans!


5 posted on 06/28/2010 4:58:47 PM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

BS.............In the end he will fold like a K-Mart suit.


6 posted on 06/28/2010 5:01:05 PM PDT by CMailBag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

He’s voting “No” so that Ron Johnston won’t have another great ad to run against him. He wants to save his ass and keep being a senator.


7 posted on 06/28/2010 5:06:56 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man

Dump Feingold the panderer in disguise. C’mon Wisconsin-—do the right thing!


8 posted on 06/28/2010 5:13:08 PM PDT by tflabo (Restore the Republic)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
He's voting "no" for all the wrong reasons

That a bill will not do what it purports to do, especially some omnibus tripe that is called "reform" - that is a grand reason to vote against it. Voting against lies is never wrong.

9 posted on 06/28/2010 5:16:03 PM PDT by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Feingold knows he’s a vote cycle away from being a shoe salesman. No offense to shoe salesmen intended.


10 posted on 06/28/2010 5:18:50 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Someone important make......The Call!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimfree
"That a bill will not do what it purports to do, especially some omnibus tripe that is called "reform" - that is a grand reason to vote against it"

True, but he thinks it won't work for all the wrong reasons. He also doesn't seem to have any problems with the $90-billion tax that was inserted by the House in the 11th hour.

To the far left dorks, Feingold will be something of a hero. To the people who are barely paying attention in MN, they'll think Feingold is standing up against big government. He isn't. He standing up against big government, and holding out for GINORMOUS government.

11 posted on 06/28/2010 5:24:32 PM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MarkeyD

Feingold isn’t feeling any pressure, he’s holding out for the highest bid. When Obama needs his vote he’ll ante up and Feingold will then brag that he brought home the bacon. Like prostitutes and johns, it’s just a matter of haggling over price.


12 posted on 06/28/2010 6:23:00 PM PDT by Obadiah (I can see November from my house!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Feingold is, unfortunately, from my state Wisconsin, not Minnesota.


13 posted on 06/29/2010 7:57:18 AM PDT by driftless2 (For long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: driftless2
"Feingold is, unfortunately, from my state Wisconsin, not Minnesota."

Sorry, I always do that. Somehow, it just seems appropriate if Feingold and Franken are a match set.

14 posted on 06/29/2010 8:03:23 AM PDT by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson