Posted on 06/26/2010 5:27:47 AM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
Russia mulls purchase of Ukrainian missile cruiser
Russia considers purchasing an unfinished missile cruiser from Ukraine, Russian Navy Commander Admiral Vladimir Vysotsky said on Saturday.
Construction of the Slava class Admiral Lobov cruiser was launched in 1984 at the Nikolayev shipyard in Ukraine but stalled in the late 1980s due to a sharp reduction in military expenditure.
The cruiser was renamed the Ukraina in 1992.
A Russian-Ukraine intergovernmental commission discussed the purchase of the Ukraina last week in Sevastopol, a major base for the Russian and Ukrainian navies.
"We agreed with the Ukrainian side that we will consider all variants of the ship's fate and present our proposals by the next meting in the fourth of the year," Vysotsky said.
A senior Russian Navy official told RIA Novosti the cruiser was only 50% complete and that the repairs and upgrade would cost up to 35 billion rubles.
He said that while this sum was enough to buy four Kilo class non-atomic submarines or four Steregushchy class corvettes for the Russian Navy, Moscow may still press ahead with the purchase as part of the wider campaign to reset relation with Kiev.
In late May, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev agreed with his Ukrainian counterpart Viktor Yanukovych that Russia will help Ukraine to finish the construction of the cruiser.
Slava class cruisers were designed as surface strike ships with some anti-aircraft and ASW capability. They carry 16 SS-N-12 Sandbox nuclear-capable supersonic anti-ship missiles, with launchers mounted in four pairs on either side of the superstructure.
Russia has three Slava class cruisers in service with its Navy.
MOSCOW, June 26 (RIA Novosti)
Help me out here, Navy types. This thing is a dinosaur. (Yes?) I’d think that to survive as a first rate cruiser you’d have to be built from the bottom up with stealth in mind.
The Slava class was not meant to stick around and slug it out. In a major war between NATO and WP most major naval surface ships were not expected to survive (including carriers btw). A Slava was only meant to survive long enough to launch most or all of its long range supersonic missiles (which would also be nuclear tipped), and then after that it didn’t matter if it survived or not (after all, if the Slava was sunk, but managed to destroy a carrier task group, then that was a perfectly acceptable exchange ratio). Thus, just like its aerial analogue the Bear, which many also say is obsolete, the thing that should be looked at are the highly capable and seriously potent missiles they carry. The ship (and plane) is simply a long distance launch platform for the missiles; and once that is done then it really doesn’t matter what happens after.
Well stated. It is unwise to underestimate a solid missile platform.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.