You're citing a case of Public Distribution of Child Pornography.
As I've said all along, I have no objection to such laws. I affirm the right of local communities to police obscenity from the Public Commons.
I do object to Trespassing upon Private Property for the purpose of rifling through a NON-PUBLIC family photo album, looking for pictures of naked toddlers running around and trying to determine whether or not they're "provocative".
Actually, the children weren't nude, it was the "provocative" nature of the pictures that made it pornography. These pictures were sent from PRIVATE property to (sick) men who got their jollies looking at young girls. I would hope that we'd both agree that this sort of thing should be unlawful.
I do object to Trespassing upon Private Property for the purpose of rifling through a NON-PUBLIC family photo album, looking for pictures of naked toddlers running around and trying to determine whether or not they're "provocative".
Who wouldn't object to that sort of infringement on a family's civil rights? Are you implying that law enforcement officials are entering private homes without probable cause and going through people's family photo albums, hoping they'll find something they deem as "lewd"?