I don’t “approve” of any of these things, Harry. I just don’t think that criminalisation is an option right now - that’s all.
Take the whole issue of pornography. In the space of less than a generation it’s moved from the fringes of society to the mainstream, and it’s now everywhere. It’s because attitudes have changed. Most people still disapprove of pornography (or say they do) but are more prepared to tolerate it, as long as there are laws to protect minors. That is why many obscenity prosecutions fail, even for material that is extreme and frankly disgusting.
That’s where we are right now, whether we like it or not. All this may change again in the future, the way it’s changed so many times in the past. Social history is cyclic.
No, actually the attitudes haven't changed at all, morally corrupt tyrannical liberal atheist activist judges are forcing they're views onto society. Perverting the original intent of the US Constitution, they removed God from the public square and crammed their perverted "mainstream" degeneracy down the throats of the American people.
Let me ask you this, do you think the founders included 'pornography' vulgar art 'urine jesus' and the like as a form of constitutionally protected forms of free speech?