[acapesket]

Jarrett Barios? YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING ME?
POS

[cantabile]

What's ahead? Just a guess, but I'd say they keep voting until the result comes out "right" (by which, of course, I mean wrong).

Except here in Our Benighted Commonwealth, where all attempts to put the ukase of the Supreme Judicial Court before the voters will be thwarted in saecula saeculorum.

[massmike]

What part of 0 for 31 at the ballot box don’t these people understand?

[historyrepeatz]

Did the b*lls in her pants sink too?

[Yossarian]

Well, that’s a mighty balanced article - Five pro-gay-marriage advocates and a famously liberal-biased pollster!

[tanuki]

My heart sank the last time this corrupt b***h was re-elected.

[Da Mav]

If even Constitutional Amendments can be overturned by the courts, we have lost one of the bedrock means of people being able to influence governmental policy. No matter how we vote, no matter how we play by the rules and win, the referees simply take it upon themselves to determine the score. It’s a dictatorship by committee.

[calcowgirl]

The Post asked state residents, pollsters and others what it would mean for the cause of gay marriage if the law is overturned. Below, responses from Scott Keeter, Joe Mathews, Morgan Meneses-Sheets, Ayelet Waldman, Dianne Feinstein and Jarrett T. Barrios.

That's what I love about WaPo -- their conscientious efforts to get varying opinions from across the political spectrum. Such balanced reporting! /s

• SCOTT KEETER, Director of survey research at Pew Research Center

• JOE MATHEWS, Senior fellow at the New America Foundation

• MORGAN MENESES-SHEETS, Executive director of Equality Maryland

• AYELET WALDMAN, Author based in Berkeley, Calif.; her next novel, "Red Hook Road," is to be published in July

• DIANNE FEINSTEIN, Democratic senator from California

• JARRETT T. BARRIOS, President of Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation