To: Clint N. Suhks
But what happens if Barry decides he'd rather have BP's NA division that the money? Jeez louise, talk about a conflict of interest. All Barry would have to do is find a way to torpedo the stock and now he's got himself an oil company. And is the parent, BP, still on the hook for damages? Jeez, somebody better get a really good look at the fine print in that deal.
Not that the fine print actually means anything, now that I think about it.
Note to shareholders: Fire the damn board and get yourselves a lawfirm while you still have a company.
60 posted on
06/18/2010 9:38:26 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Still voteless in NY-29. Over 250 roll call votes missed and counting...)
To: mewzilla
This guy sounds like the same one that called Hannity yesterday...
62 posted on
06/18/2010 9:39:40 AM PDT by
who knows what evil?
(G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
To: mewzilla
i would think the liability would be limited to the assets owned by the bp usa company
that is why i would remove all assets from bp usa and let it go bankrupt - bp tried to do the right thing - the democrats won’t accept that - they want to kill the golden goose - if i were bp, i’d kill the goose and leave them with nothing
66 posted on
06/18/2010 9:42:08 AM PDT by
sloop
(pfc in the quiet civil war)
To: mewzilla
I think past BP USA The Hauge gets involved. And since Eric Holder is a One Worlder I’m sure he will do what ever he thinks is necessary and have the UN write a mean letter of rebuke.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson