Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Bob

I think it’s in quotes because it’s a quote. The person identified himself only as a “student.” However, that has yet to be confirmed. So they can’t say he was a student—they haven’t confirmed it. They can refer to him as a “student”, because that’s quoting the individual.


95 posted on 06/14/2010 10:57:17 AM PDT by Huck (Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies ]


To: Huck
I think it’s in quotes because it’s a quote. The person identified himself only as a “student.” However, that has yet to be confirmed. So they can’t say he was a student—they haven’t confirmed it. They can refer to him as a “student”, because that’s quoting the individual.

Legitimate quoting is not done for individual words. The use of scare quotes is generally done to insinuate that the description is questionable.

Suppose that a congressman and his wife had spent the weekend at a hotel. If the hotel staff (being quoted) said that the congressman and his wife stayed there, would you expect only the word wife to be put in quotes like that? I think it's entirely natural for most people to take a completely different meaning from the following two (almost identical) headlines:

Congressman Jones and his Wife Spend Weekend at the Fairmont.

versus

Congressman Jones and his "Wife" Spend Weekend at the Fairmont.

132 posted on 06/14/2010 11:15:08 AM PDT by Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson