Skip to comments.
Obama adviser questions legitimacy of SC candidate
AP via Breitbart ^
| June 13, 2010
| n/A
Posted on 06/13/2010 7:19:58 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
A senior adviser to President Barack Obama says the Democratic nominee for the Senate in South Carolina doesn't appear to be a legitimate candidate. South Carolina Democrats chose a political unknown, 32-year-old Alvin Greene, to run against Republican Sen. Jim DeMint this fall.
Greene is an unemployed military veteran who hardly campaigned for the office, and his victory last Tuesday has raised questions about who backed his candidacy.
And it turns out that he's facing a felony charge.
Obama adviser David Axelrod says South Carolina Democrats deserve a strong, credible candidate. He says it's a big mystery how Greene won.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
TOPICS: Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS: alvingreene; democrats; elections; greene; nobc; nobirthcertificate; nodocumentation; potkettleblack; wca
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
To: Jet Jaguar
Oh please get involved in this mister President.
2
posted on
06/13/2010 7:21:46 AM PDT
by
cripplecreek
(Remember the River Raisin! (look it up))
To: Jet Jaguar
“He says it’s a big mystery how Greene won.”
No mystery. The guys he hired to stuff the ballot boxes must have checked the wrong name.
3
posted on
06/13/2010 7:23:25 AM PDT
by
Brilliant
To: Jet Jaguar
A senior adviser to President Barack Obama says the Democratic nominee for the Senate in South Carolina doesn't appear to be a legitimate candidate. I guess winning the majority of the votes in a legal primary doesn't grant legitimacy. If not then what does?
To: Jet Jaguar
5
posted on
06/13/2010 7:23:49 AM PDT
by
ASA Vet
(Natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. De Vattel)
To: Jet Jaguar; 2A Patriot; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; 77Jimmy; A Strict Constructionist; ...
South Carolina
Ping
Send FReepmail to join or leave this list.
6
posted on
06/13/2010 7:25:58 AM PDT
by
upchuck
(Don't let freedom slip away. After America, there is no place to go ~ Kitty Werthmann - Google her.)
To: Jet Jaguar
Does the administration now have a say in the matter? Who can run for office?
7
posted on
06/13/2010 7:27:12 AM PDT
by
listenhillary
(You might be a modern LIBERAL if you read 1984 & said "YEAH! That's the world that I want!")
To: Non-Sequitur
I guess winning the majority of the votes in a legal primary doesn’t grant legitimacy. If not then what does?
Them that also applies to Obama????
8
posted on
06/13/2010 7:27:41 AM PDT
by
fourdny2
(God Bless The USA and GWB)
To: Jet Jaguar
This is *satire*, right?
I nearly fell for it.
9
posted on
06/13/2010 7:28:18 AM PDT
by
Tanniker Smith
(Obi-Wan Palin: Strike her down and she shall become more powerful than you could possibly imagine.)
To: Jet Jaguar
And it turns out that he's facing a felony charge. Who? Greene, Axelrod, or Obama?
10
posted on
06/13/2010 7:28:45 AM PDT
by
UCANSEE2
(The Last Boy Scout)
To: Jet Jaguar
Nothing the democrats hate more than democracy...
11
posted on
06/13/2010 7:28:54 AM PDT
by
Wpin
("I Have Sworn Upon the Altar of God eternal hostility against every form of tyranny...")
To: listenhillary
Does the administration now have a say in the matter? Who can run for office? Ask us again in November...
12
posted on
06/13/2010 7:29:41 AM PDT
by
null and void
(We are now in day 506 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: Jet Jaguar
A senior adviser to President Barack Obama says the Democratic nominee for the Senate in South Carolina doesn't appear to be a legitimate candidate. I bet he can show a legal birth certificate.
13
posted on
06/13/2010 7:29:59 AM PDT
by
ladyvet
(WOLVERINES!!!!!)
To: Jet Jaguar
Nullification of voters (Democrat no less) by the WH.
That’s the ticket.
I guess Obama and Friends think they should be just annointing office holders. No need for any stink’in elections.
14
posted on
06/13/2010 7:30:01 AM PDT
by
rod1
To: Jet Jaguar
If the Democrats can’t even run their own primaries, what does that say about their fitness to hold any elective office.
15
posted on
06/13/2010 7:30:14 AM PDT
by
monocle
To: Jet Jaguar
his victory last Tuesday has raised questions about who backed his candidacy NO, the question is.....
.....Who voted for him, and how did they vote (multiple times, dead voters, computer vote fraud, etc.)
16
posted on
06/13/2010 7:31:06 AM PDT
by
SteamShovel
(If the RAT party is for Hippies, the "Tea Party" is for "Teapies".)
To: Jet Jaguar
Obama adviser David Axelrod says South Carolina Democrats deserve a strong, credible candidate. He says it’s a big mystery how OBAMA won.
Hell, AxelRed I agree.
How did he win?
$800,000,000 in illegal donations from “Mickey Mouse” perhaps???
Ya sh*t
To: Jet Jaguar
Follow the money....When Greene filled out the form in the criminal porn case, disclosed his assets and got a public defender, he lied about his finances. If he had $10K in the bank, he wouldn’t have gotten a PD.
More popcorn please.
18
posted on
06/13/2010 7:32:47 AM PDT
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: ladyvet
I bet he can show a legal birth certificate.Since hes a VET, I would bet he can.
To: monocle
If the Democrats can’t even run their own primaries, what does that say about their fitness to hold any elective office. The evidence that RATS can't govern is overwhelming.....
.....and they continue to be elected.
20
posted on
06/13/2010 7:33:38 AM PDT
by
SteamShovel
(If the RAT party is for Hippies, the "Tea Party" is for "Teapies".)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-59 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
