Yeah I just read about how prohibitionist language and how she’s back tracking now (calling people who chose to drink imbibers lol).
If a candidate who wasn’t backed by the Tea Party Express would have expressed prohibitionist rhetoric like she has FR would be up in flames.
Sue Lowden seemed like such a great candidate.
Sue Lowden is a freakin’ moron...I’m so glad she lost. I wouldn’t vote her in for anything, including but not limited to Dog Catcher. I was a delegate a couple of years ago and saw first hand how she tried to handle the “little people” (i.e. conservative voters). She’s a fraud and an arrogant one at that. I know Sharron personally - she’s fantastic, and any little crap her opponents (with either an R or a D after thier name) try to throw at her will pale in significance to the all the crap Dingy Harry will be called to the carpet for.
There are a lot of nay-sayers out there that are either in sour-grapes mode because thier candidate lost or are trying to paint Sharron as an “extreme right-wing-freak”. She’s just a conservative who had the gall to raise her family well, then go into politics to try to save the Republic. She’s going to be attacked ruthlessly. We all know that. But many folk’s eyes have been opened, and because of that, she’s going to win.
I want you all to think about being her position right now - an unapologetic constitutional conservative (David) going up against one of the most powerful, dangerous men in the country (Goliath)...remember that story? Because of her passion, integrity and courage to face this monster, she will prevail. The only question is, will we have the nads to stand with her, or will we allow our little tails to curl up and run quivering to a corner?
I already know what side I’m on, how ‘bout you?