Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sonofstrangelove

“Officials said UN members would be banned from selling such heavy weapons as main battle tanks, combat aircraft and ballistic missiles to Teheran’s military...But there are no defensive systems, such as S-300 missiles, on the list.”

The irony here being that the S-300 probably gives Iran a better hand to play against potential military threats to its nuke program than any of the things on the banned list.


2 posted on 06/11/2010 12:00:09 AM PDT by DemforBush (Serpentine, Shel! SERPENTINE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DemforBush

“it sends an unmistakable message about the international community’s commitment to stopping the spread of nuclear weapons”

No, Mr. President, the unmistakable message it sends is that Iran is free to load up on whatever defensive measures are required to repel the inevitable attack by Israel on its nuclear facilities. This exposes these sanctions as nothing more than a smokescreen to appear “tough” while actually capitulating in the face of an adversary who steadfastly refuses to blink. With “friends” like the U.S., why does Israel need enemies?


3 posted on 06/11/2010 4:48:37 AM PDT by DrC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson