To: BenKenobi; Tolsti2
Frankly I don’t see how that argument addresses my point that both world wars had 16 year olds serving. That was need and necessity. This is foolish ego at work. She's fighting no enemy. She's living a fantasy that could, and may still, kill her and it serves no purpose. All she gets are bragging rights. Is that worth her young life?
342 posted on
06/10/2010 7:10:11 PM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: DJ MacWoW
and it serves no purposeHuman achievement serves no purpose?
347 posted on
06/10/2010 7:18:33 PM PDT by
cmj328
(Got ruthless?)
To: DJ MacWoW
Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.
Was it really necessary to send 16 year olds off to die for their country?
Or did they serve out of desire?
350 posted on
06/10/2010 7:28:25 PM PDT by
BenKenobi
(I want to hear more about Sam! Samwise the stouthearted!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson