To: Deb; Bokababe; dcwusmc; rabscuttle385
Or maybe you favor such a course of action, so long as you're making the determination.
Exactly. Statists come in all forms and all sizes. Some even call themselves conservatives, hide on conservative forums, and call themselves Republicans.
Someone said it best the other day - Democrats want a mommy government, and Republicans want a daddy government. There is no difference between the two. They're all statists and basically 'progressives' when you strip down to it. They advocate increasing federal power beyond that which is enumerated to impose their will on others. Not people I want on 'my' side!
47 posted on
06/07/2010 1:25:27 PM PDT by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: bamahead
You cross-dressing Marxists don’t deserve a “side”.
53 posted on
06/07/2010 1:39:54 PM PDT by
Deb
(Beat him, strip him and bring him to my tent!)
To: bamahead
I’d like to propose the FR corollary to Godwin’s law, thus: “As a FR dope/LE thread grows longer, the probability of a Libertarian calling a conservative a “statist” approaches unity”.
57 posted on
06/07/2010 1:43:32 PM PDT by
absalom01
(Claire Wolfe, call your office.)
To: bamahead
They're all statists and basically 'progressives' when you strip down to it.As I understand things, the Federal "war on drugs" has been a progressive initiative from the get go, and it truly puzzles me as to why "conservatives" even bother to support it.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson