“So you believe that Utah law does not apply to BofA when it does business in Utah?”
Utah should have made it clear that assets of Utah businesses should be substantially discounted before they are sold to anyone outside of Utah.
I’m sure Utah business owners will appreciate this defacto result of the courts, and of Utah “law”.
I’m sorry - but that’s a sorry excuse for reasoning.
The law says that in-person negotiation must be accommodated.
Bank of America has to abide by the laws of each and every state it does business in when doing business in that state.
You seem to believe that Utah has the responsibility to abide by Bank of America’s rules, instead of the other way around.
Or, perhaps you prefer the idea that Bank of America should be bailed out of their obligation to abide by the laws of the states they do business in?