Posted on 06/05/2010 9:57:28 AM PDT by Seizethecarp
Most of the online sites and print venues have declined to publish anything that deals with this inflammable subject. Why such reluctance? One editor explained that they are wary of falling into a trap in which, having printed an article disputing the president's bona fides, the documents attesting to his authenticity are suddenly sprung on them, leaving them with egg on their faces and strengthening the president's authority. This is an unlikely hypothesis.
....
Some people consider the "birther" controversy an unfortunate distraction from more important matters, as, for example, Obama's propensity for making inexplicable decisions or the mass of other significant documents kept under seal. Focusing on the affair, they say, is counter-productive. Many feel it is nothing but a slanderous and partisan campaign that does not merit the attention of mature observers. Still others are simply afraid of being mercilessly ridiculed and written off as wingnuts, or intuit it is demonstrably unsafe to meddle in such concerns. And many, too, simply cannot believe that a hoax of this enormity can have been successfully perpetrated in a free society and consequently cannot but regard the birther claims as the product of deranged minds – but then, the worldwide AGW scam might have educated us to such possibilities. The malign influence of a complicit media is extremely powerful, seeping into the consciousness of even the most hardened skeptics and leaving a residue of unwarranted belief in the untenable or problematic. Finally, some who suspect the birthers may be right feel it would do more harm to America to expose an imposture of this magnitude than to let it run its course until the next election when Obama might be voted out of office. "Might be," regrettably, is not "will be."
(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...
John Fitzgerald (or Jack) Kennedy. Born May 29, 1917 in Brookline, Massachusetts; died November 22, 1963 in Dallas, Texas. 35th President of the United States. Son of Joseph P. Kennedy, Sr., and Rose Fitzgerald, both of Irish decent.
Hm?...So?...Obama uses tax paid U.S. attorneys to prevent the release of **common** documents that ordinary citizens provide routinely for many reasons? Why?
A **real** natural born American president would be HONORED to promptly prove with the best evidence that he was a natural born citizen. He wouldn't use lawyers of any kind.
A FOREIGN USURPER wastes tax dollars and U.S. attorney time to hide whether or not he is natural born and eligible for the job.
And...The above has nothing whatsoever to do with the law. It is what real natural born citizens and foreign usurpers would do.
I thought you meant John Frick’n Kerry.
“documents that ordinary citizens provide routinely for many reasons? Why?”
Because he didn’t have to.
A **real** natural born American would have been **HONORED** to promptly prove ( with the very best and complete evidence) that he was eligible to be Commander in Chief and president of the United States of America.
A **FOREIGN USURPER** uses Department of Justice and tax paid U.S. attorneys to hide these documents.
A **FOREIGN USURPER** allows a decorated officer ( LTC Lakin)to go to court martial rather than provide the common evidence ordinary Americans release routinely for many reasons.
or Jomo Freedom Kenyatta
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.