Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MLB deciding whether to review call
sports.espn.go.com ^ | 6/3/10 | u7nknown

Posted on 06/03/2010 8:49:00 AM PDT by ICAB9USA

NEW YORK -- Major League Baseball was still deciding Thursday morning whether to review the umpire's blown call that cost Detroit Tigers pitcher Armando Galarraga a perfect game.

Commissioner Bud Selig has the power to reverse umpire Jim Joyce's missed call that came with two outs in the ninth inning Wednesday night in Detroit. Joyce ruled Cleveland's Jason Donald safe, then admitted he got it wrong.

Selig would likely consult with his top advisers before making such a ruling. St. Louis Cardinals manager Tony La Russa says the call should be overturned.

Joyce was scheduled to be back at work Thursday afternoon, umpiring at home plate in the game between the Tigers and Indians.

(Excerpt) Read more at sports.espn.go.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: armandogalarraga; baseball; michigan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-182 next last
To: softwarecreator

“The call should stand”.

Baseball is a game that teaches us about life. Life isn’t fair. A judgment call means what it says. Judgment, right or wrong. It’s part of baseball, it’s part of life. Leave it alone.


81 posted on 06/03/2010 9:21:52 AM PDT by Murp (!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: ICAB9USA

One problem with allowing reversal after the game is that it doesn’t work in both directions. In this case, the game would be over, so it would be no big deal. Let’s say, however, that runner was safe and was called out? Now the game continues the next day, or the next week if the league acts slowly. However, now you have different pitchers who are rested and ready. The game’s outcome could be quite different than it would have been had the right call been made in the first place and play continued. For balls and strikes, we could just use technology and do away with umps. For outs and fouls, sensors in the foul lines and poles and players’ gloves could do the job. Then we could just hire umpires to look for balks and the like. The game would be 99.9% perfectly called, and it would stink.


82 posted on 06/03/2010 9:22:16 AM PDT by Dr. Sivana (There is no salvation in politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

“If they reverse an umpire’s call after the game, then baseball as we know it is dead.”

This case is special enough that I think it is appropriate. This is why they need limited use of instant replay.


83 posted on 06/03/2010 9:23:40 AM PDT by Hacklehead (Liberalism is the art of taking what works, breaking it, and then blaming conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Murp

I see your point, but we don’t need baseball to teach us life. Life does that.

Justice should prevail.

If you are falsely accused of a crime, and visual evidence proves it, wouldn’t you want the call reversed?


84 posted on 06/03/2010 9:24:24 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Been done before. George Brett's pinetar homerun comes to mind.

Apples and oranges, Brett was caught using an illegal bat...the rules are very clear about that.

The umpire made a bad call, that's part of the game.........

85 posted on 06/03/2010 9:24:28 AM PDT by Hot Tabasco (Peanut butter was just peanut butter until I found Free Republic.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Murp
"A good friend of mine used to say, 'This is a very simple game. You throw the ball, you catch the ball, you hit the ball. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, sometimes it rains.' Think about that for a while."
--Ebby Calvin LaLoosh

86 posted on 06/03/2010 9:24:42 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

I’m amazed how many of you are unwilling to think outside of the box on this one.

Let justice prevail.


87 posted on 06/03/2010 9:25:57 AM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Lancey Howard

Rule 2 defines catch:

A CATCH is the act of a fielder in getting secure possession in his hand or glove of a ball in flight and firmly holding it; providing he does not use his cap, protector, pocket or any other part of his uniform in getting possession. It is not a catch, however, if simultaneously or immediately following his contact with the ball, he collides with a player, or with a wall, or if he falls down, and as a result of such collision or falling, drops the ball. It is not a catch if a fielder touches a fly ball which then hits a member of the offensive team or an umpire and then is caught by another defensive player. If the fielder has made the catch and drops the ball while in the act of making a throw following the catch, the ball shall be adjudged to have been caught. In establishing the validity of the catch, the fielder shall hold the ball long enough to prove that he has complete control of the ball and that his release of the ball is voluntary and intentional.

He caught the ball at first.


88 posted on 06/03/2010 9:28:12 AM PDT by Publius Valerius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Retired Greyhound
Modern technology enables us to get it right. It should be used.

During a game, not after it. Is MLB going to go back a reverse the call against the St. Louis Cardinals in game six of the World Series in 1985 and take the championship away that year from the Royals, too?

Instant replay of every call would result in four hour games at minimum. If instant replay is going to be expanded, it needs to be used the way it is in the NFL -- with managers allowed a limited number of challenges per game.

89 posted on 06/03/2010 9:28:13 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Sivana
MacPhail ruled not that the bat didn't have too much pine tar on it, but that a penalty not allowed in the rules was applied.

Actually, there was no penalty specified in the rules and in that case it falls squarely under the umpire's prerogative - it was a judgment call.

The umpire absolutely had the authority to do what he did and his call was correct.

90 posted on 06/03/2010 9:29:20 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who like to be called Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: ICAB9USA

I’m miffed at the botched call, but to overturn the call would set a horrible precedent.


91 posted on 06/03/2010 9:30:09 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Murp
exactly. And my point is that IF they reverse the call, does not every batter or pitcher or team that "was robbed" by a call now have a legitimate claim to have it reversed? It'll open up a whole BIG can of worms.

The call was unfortunate ... but it's over. period.

92 posted on 06/03/2010 9:30:55 AM PDT by softwarecreator (I want my greenshoots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

love that movie!


93 posted on 06/03/2010 9:31:42 AM PDT by softwarecreator (I want my greenshoots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco; Non-Sequitur
Apples and oranges, Brett was caught using an illegal bat...the rules are very clear about that.

It's apples and oranges, but not in the way you porptray it.

The call in the Pine Tar Game was a correct call, but it was overturned anyway.

The call in this game was completely incorrect - as even the umpire himself admits.

If the Pine Tar Game result could be overturned even though the officiating was technically correct, why can't this clearly incorrect call be overturned?

94 posted on 06/03/2010 9:32:36 AM PDT by wideawake (Why is it that those who like to be called Constitutionalists know the least about the Constitution?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: QualityMan

Agreed.


95 posted on 06/03/2010 9:32:40 AM PDT by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy

Yep, it’s ruining NFL football, yes I understand the need to make sure calls are correct, but it’s ridiculous how it ruins the flow of a game.


96 posted on 06/03/2010 9:34:04 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: Night Hides Not
In reading all of the posts, having heard the ump's position, and seeing the replays from multiples angles myself, I'll throw in my two cents' worth:

1. The kid did indeed earn his perfecto. I saw the ball 'move' in the glove, but it seemed to still be under full control -- the NFL worries a lot more about that issue than does baseball.
2. We do have a baseball precedent...the 'Pine Tar' game. That one was handled a lot less cleanly than this would be.
3. There are two stats that would be impacted by a reversal: (a) the 'hit' awarded to Jason Donald; (b) the out recorded by Trevor Crowe to (re)end the game.

Crowe wouldn't complain if there's a reversal - his batting average would increase as a result since he would never have batted. Donald's average would decrease, but he'll never have to answer questions about the 'tainted' hit for the rest of his life.

This is correctable - and probably should be done for the sake of the history involved. Had the blown call occurred in the fourth inning... or even the eighth... then you can argue that a change would impact the game's outcome. But not so here with 2+ outs in the ninth.

The commish should fix this.

97 posted on 06/03/2010 9:34:51 AM PDT by alancarp (Please don't tell Obama what comes after "trillion")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: sbMKE
Still, there is absolutely no harm in reversing the call and granting the perfect game.

It's unfair to pitchers in the past that threw no-hitters or perfect games that were lost due to a poor call by an umpire.

The umpire and the umpire alone has the authority to make a call on the field. Those are the rules of the game and the commissioner shouldn't be rescinding them.

98 posted on 06/03/2010 9:34:58 AM PDT by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: alancarp

But it would be like awarding somebody an Olympic Gold Medal after the fact, yes they get the medal, but it can never make up for missing out on being on top of the podium and hearing your anthem played.


99 posted on 06/03/2010 9:39:22 AM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ICAB9USA

The call needs to be overturned. This is a no-brainer.


100 posted on 06/03/2010 9:39:50 AM PDT by ILS21R
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson