If you were to read the brief you might notice that it asks that the appellate judges on the panel whose opinion you posted recuse themselves, having ‘embraced’ the lower court’s bias.
It’s the SECOND SENTENCE .. not too deep into the brief:
“They also request of the members of this Court, particularly those who have embraced the bias of the court below, that they consider their obligation to recuse themselves if they present even an appearance of bias under that statute.”
So how much DID you read or comprehend? You caught them out on the improper use of a single word? tsk tsk.
You can’t get far by accusing all the judges of bias. Nor do they present any credible evidence of bias. For example, they cite ““The plaintiff says that he is a retired Air Force colonel who continues to owe fealty to his Commander-in-Chief…”” as proof of bias, since the guy IS a retired officer. However, what the court was referring to in “says” is the “continues to owe fealty to his Commander-in-Chief…” - which is bogus. As a retired officer, I don’t feel any “fealty” to Obama at all. I didn’t feel any “fealty” to Clinton while I was in uniform.
That was a very weak attempt at ‘standing’ and it made the case look stupid...although filing it against “Soetoro” had already done a fine job of that!
If you were to read the brief you might notice that it asks that the appellate judges on the panel whose opinion you posted recuse themselves, having ‘embraced’ the lower court’s bias.
It’s the SECOND SENTENCE .. not too deep into the brief:
“They also request of the members of this Court, particularly those who have embraced the bias of the court below, that they consider their obligation to recuse themselves if they present even an appearance of bias under that statute.”
So how much DID you read or comprehend? You caught them out on the improper use of a single word? tsk tsk.