“Appellants have provided no reasonable basis for questioning the impartiality of the district court judge. See Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540 (1994).”
I would say that the brief filed and posted in this thread takes care of THAT. Not that you would notice.
I would say that the brief filed and posted in this thread takes care of THAT. Not that you would notice.
That’s what I noticed aside from the fact that the word “vacation” of opinion is used incorrectly in the motion for recussal.
“The plaintiffs/appellants jointly move for recusal of the judge below pursuant to and the vacation of his opinions as a consequence of the recognition of his bias and appearance of bias under that statute.”
I think they want Judge Robertson to go on vacation. The correct term would be “vacating.”