Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: D-fendr
"Another difference between Ixtoc is the area hit. South Texas beaches versus the marshes.And booms were effective. Some oil escaped around, but Impacts to the estuaries were minor."

Oh, I suspect some oil also made its way ashore around Ixtoc. The one thing I have not yet located is a science study of the immediate vicinity of the Ixtoc well itself.

But such documentation "does" exist for the Persian Gulf "Saddam Hussein" spill. The worst affects were seen in the salt marshes, which took up to ten years to recover....BUT...the magnitude of the oiling was hugely greater than Ixtoc was or BP is likely to be. Beaches were completely covered up to the high-tide water marks with al layer of oil, and oil seeped down into the soil to a depth of 60 cm.

In areas where the oil coverage was not total, recovery was a lot faster.

http://www.c-3.org.uk/Multimedia/Reports/Gulf%20war_Poonian.pdf

142 posted on 06/02/2010 5:07:06 AM PDT by Wonder Warthog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 140 | View Replies ]


To: Wonder Warthog
I suspect some oil also made its way ashore around Ixtoc.

Oh yes, and all of the South Texas coast was impaced by it, North Padre Island especially. Booms, however, protected most of the estuaries. My point was about where the oil hits shore. The marshes of LA being much more vulnerable and valuable than the sandy beaches of South Texas.

144 posted on 06/02/2010 8:24:50 AM PDT by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson