Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: east1234

BP’s investment in Nalco and oil industry representation on the board is the main reasons that Corexit was used instead of Dispirsit, which EPA testing shows to be twice as effective and a third less toxic. BP is hedging its losses with the profit it will make with its investment in Nalco, but who else benefits?

Follow the money...and the money goes to Goldman Sachs and friends.


212 posted on 05/26/2010 10:28:48 PM PDT by mojitojoe (banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 197 | View Replies ]


To: mojitojoe

A) Was it available in quantity?
B) Is there any question about it effecting the reproductive system of aquatic life.
C) Why would BP choose a worse agent for dispersal purposes? Because they want to exacerbate the problem?

Lastly, this dispersant is made by Exxon or one of it’s subsidiaries.

Tin foil available on Aisle 2.


226 posted on 05/26/2010 11:56:35 PM PDT by FreeStateYank (I want my country and constitution back, now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson