To: exit82
Exactly, with a slight modification. She would have been the dem CANDIDATE. Been saying that all along too. Never in the hisory of the world would voters in the US have voted hillary for president, and both clintons had way too much to lose. They needed a candidate who could not possibly lose and a republican opponent who would...on purpose.
126 posted on
05/23/2010 8:42:55 PM PDT by
MestaMachine
(De inimico non loquaris sed cogites- Don't wish ill for your enemy; plan it)
To: MestaMachine
128 posted on
05/23/2010 8:44:22 PM PDT by
exit82
(Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
To: MestaMachine
Someone or some group is behind the Clintons as well. He may have made the contacts, but stuff like Whitewater indicates they are grifters. Maybe when they rose to potential power the puppetmasters gave them some keys. Whoever is behind this has been planning for a very, very long time. McCain was compromised in Viet Nam. Bill in Moscow. Obama, by several agents in his youth, including his grandfather. This is bigger than the Clintons. This is more like Krushchev put something together before banging his shoe on the table old. He knew something then, we’re seeing it now.
143 posted on
05/23/2010 9:06:57 PM PDT by
Hoosier-Daddy
( "It does no good to be a super power if you have to worry what the neighbors think." BuffaloJack)
To: MestaMachine; exit82
I have always said long ago that this “administration”(?) looks MORE as a Clinton administration than the previous Clinton administration!!!
164 posted on
05/23/2010 9:42:45 PM PDT by
danamco
(")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson